Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Conducting a Literature Review

PICO - used in evidence-based clinical practice; quantitative reviews

Additional letters (for PICOT, PICOS, PICOTS, PICOTTS)

  • Timeframe
  • Type of study
  • Setting

Haynes, R. B., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Sackett, D. L. (1997). Evidence based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone.

SPIDER - useful for qualitative & mixed-methods research

Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesisQualitative health research22(10), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938.

PEO - useful for qualitative research questions

Moola, S., Munn, Z., Sears, K., Sfetcu, R., Currie, M., Lisy, K., Tufanaru, C., Qureshi, R., Mattis, P., Mu, P. & (2015). Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology). International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13 (3), 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.169.0000000000000064.

SPICE- useful for qualitative research

Booth, A. (2006). Clear and present questions formulating questions for evidence based practiceLibrary Hi Tech24(3), 355–368.

PerSPECTiF - useful for qualitative research

Booth, A., Noyes, J., Flemming, K., Moore, G., Tunçalp, Ö., & Shakibazadeh, E. (2019). Formulating questions to explore complex interventions within qualitative evidence synthesisBMJ global health4(Suppl 1), e001107. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001107.